Observational studyBMC oral health2026
Evaluation of the frequency of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients with various malocclusions.
Observational study in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trauma-induced crown dilaceration of permanent maxillary central incisors: A case report with CBCT follow-up.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic patients with different malocclusions.
methodsPretreatment diagnostic records of 766 orthodontic patients were retrospectively evaluated in a single-center setting. Dental anomalies were classified according to sex, orthodontic malocclusion type (Class I, n = 122; Class II, n = 568; Class III, n = 76), and jaw localization. Statistical analyses were performed using Fisher's exact test, Yates' correction, and Pearson's chi-square test.
resultsNo statistically significant association was found between sex and the prevalence of dental anomalies (P = 0.739). At least one dental anomaly was detected in 71.8% of the patients. Root dilaceration was the most frequently observed anomaly (35%). The prevalence rates of numerical, dimensional, shape, eruption, and structural anomalies were 13.97%, 4.04%, 53.91%, 24.15%, and 30.67%, respectively. No significant difference in the prevalence of dental anomalies was observed among different malocclusion groups (P = 0.055).
conclusionsDental anomalies were frequently observed in this orthodontic population. The prevalence and distribution of anomalies varied according to anomaly type and jaw localization, highlighting the importance of radiographic evaluation in orthodontic patients. These findings may support earlier detection of diagnostic challenges and more individualized treatment planning in routine orthodontic practice. Early identification of dental anomalies may facilitate comprehensive orthodontic treatment planning and help prevent potential functional and structural complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.