Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381016›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2026

Effects of repeated preheating on polymerization shrinkage kinetics and Vickers microhardness of resin composites: an in vitro study.

Daeyeong Kim, Je Seon Song, Dohyun Kim, Yooseok Shin

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daeyeong KimDepartment of Conservative Dentistry, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Je Seon SongDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dohyun KimDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. dohyun0kim@yuhs.ac.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0772-6985
Yooseok ShinDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Oral Science Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. densys@yuhs.ac.

Funding

Yonsei Univeristy College of Dentistry 6-2025-0016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreheating resin composites can reduce viscosity and improve handling; however, resin syringes or capsules used in multiple clinical applications may undergo repeated heating and cooling. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of repeated preheating on the polymerization shrinkage kinetics and microhardness of resin composites.

methodsThree capsule-type nanohybrid resin composites, Filtek Z350 XT (FZ), Estelite Sigma Quick (ESQ), and EsCom250 (EC), were tested under three conditions: non-heated, one-cycle preheating, and five-cycle preheating. Under the one-cycle preheating condition, the specimens were preheated once before curing. Under the five-cycle preheating condition, the specimens underwent five preheating cycles before curing, with cooling to room temperature between cycles. Preheating was performed using a composite warmer set to 55 °C. The polymerization shrinkage strain, maximum shrinkage rate, and time to maximum shrinkage rate were measured using a real-time displacement-based system. The Vickers microhardness was measured on the upper and lower specimen surfaces after 24 h of water storage. Data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with material type and preheating conditions as fixed factors, including their interactions. Post hoc comparisons were performed for each material when appropriate.

resultsTwo-way ANOVA showed significant material × preheating-condition interactions for polymerization shrinkage strain and maximum shrinkage rate, but not for time to maximum shrinkage rate or upper- or lower-surface Vickers microhardness. Within-material comparisons showed that the preheating conditions significantly affected the shrinkage strain in the FZ and EC, the maximum shrinkage rate in all three materials, and the time to maximum shrinkage rate in the ESQ and EC. Five-cycle preheating reduced the maximum shrinkage rate in all materials and delayed the time to reach the maximum shrinkage rate in ESQ and EC. Preheating did not reduce the Vickers microhardness of the upper or lower surfaces of any of the materials.

conclusionsWithin the limitations of this in vitro study, one-cycle preheating produced limited, material-dependent changes in polymerization shrinkage kinetics and did not reduce Vickers microhardness. Five repeated preheating cycles altered the shrinkage kinetics in a material-dependent manner but did not reduce the Vickers microhardness.

Indexed as

Composite ResinsDental MaterialsHardnessHot TemperatureHumansKineticsMaterials TestingNanocompositesPolymerizationSurface PropertiesTemperatureTime FactorsViscosityComposite ResinsDental MaterialsEstelite sigmafiltek Z350Polymerization shrinkageRepeated preheatingResin compositeVickers microhardness

Identifiers

PMID42381016
PMCPMC13617807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.