Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42381011›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2026

Centromeric satellite expansion drives genome evolution in the snowy owl.

Helle Tessand Baalsrud, Benedicte Garmann-Aarhus, Emily Louise Gilbert Enevoldsen, Anders Kristian Krabberød, Dominik Fischer, Ave Tooming-Klunderud, Morten Skage, Mariann Árnyasi, Simen Rød Sandve, Kjetill Sigurd Jakobsen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Helle Tessand BaalsrudCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. helle.tessand.baalsrud@nmbu.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4161-3247
Benedicte Garmann-AarhusCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2543-1582
Emily Louise Gilbert EnevoldsenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anders Kristian KrabberødCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9481-8396
Dominik FischerClinic for Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians and Fish, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Frankfurter Str. 114, Giessen, 35392, Germany.
Ave Tooming-KlunderudCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0057-2873
Morten SkageCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5312-8038
Mariann ÁrnyasiDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-7404
Simen Rød SandveDepartment of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4989-5311
Kjetill Sigurd JakobsenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-5397
Rasmus NielsenDepartment of Integrative Biology and Department of Statistics, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0513-6591
Sanne BoessenkoolCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8033-1165
Ole Kristian TørresenCentre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1932-8212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComparative genomic studies in birds have revealed that bird genomes are relatively repeat-poor and stable in terms of karyotype, size, and gene synteny/collinearity compared to other vertebrates. One notable exception is the owls, with cytogenetic studies demonstrating large variations in karyotypes and the evolution of unusual centromeric satellite repeats in some species. However, there has so far not been an investigation into genome architecture and repeat landscape of owls.

resultsHere, we present a chromosome-level genome assembly for the snowy owl (Bubo scandiacus). We find that the repeat DNA content in the relatively large snowy owl genome (1.6 Gb) is among the highest reported for any bird genome to date (28.34% compared to an average of ~ 10% in other birds). The bulk of the snowy owl genomic repeat landscape consists of extensive centromeric satellite arrays that form large contiguous blocks across multiple chromosomes. These arrays represent one of the largest centromeric satellite expansions reported in birds and are consistent with rapid turnover and amplification of centromeric repeats. Using gene collinearity analyses we show that the position of the centromeres are not homologous with chicken centromeres, and are located in regions with collinearity breaks to other bird genomes due to chromosomal rearrangements.

conclusionsOur results support rapid satellite turnover at lineage-specific centromeres, which could have played a role in centromeric drive, reproductive isolation and speciation of the snowy owl. The extensive centromeric satellite arrays uncovered in this genome highlight centromere evolution as a potentially important driver of genome evolution in owls.

Indexed as

CentromereDNA, SatelliteEvolution, MolecularGenomeStrigiformesAnimalsDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID42381011
PMCPMC13625412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.