ArticleBMC public health2026
The effect of boarding on students' noncognitive skills: evidence from rural education in Northwest China.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA significant proliferation of boarding schools and boarding students has been observed in rural areas of China due to the challenges associated with "school consolidation" policies and parental migration from rural to urban areas for employment purposes. Hence, boarding has emerged as a prominent characteristic within the present-day rural student community. However, there remains a lack of consensus regarding the impact of boarding on noncognitive development among rural students. This study investigates the impact of boarding on students' noncognitive development using a two-period panel dataset collected during the research conducted on rural elementary schools in 2019 and 2020.
methodsUsing a two-period panel dataset comprising 10,923 students from 195 rural elementary schools in 21 counties, we employ both the propensity score matching method and instrumental variable approach to establish a causal relationship between boarding arrangements and students' noncognitive development.
resultsThis study finds that boarding has detrimental effects on students' noncognitive skills, negatively impacting certain aspects such as openness and grit, and affinity for schools. The study also reveals that the impact of boarding varies across different student subgroups, with girls, younger students, those from affluent families, and students with more educated mothers benefiting more from the boarding experience. The study also examines pathways through which boarding influences students' noncognitive development.
conclusionsThis paper proposes the following policy recommendations: (1) At the familial level, parents should allocate additional time and effort towards nurturing their children's emotional well-being and academic performance. (2) Schools ought to incorporate curriculum training programs aimed at enhancing students' noncognitive skills, including self-care, resilience, and interpersonal abilities. (3) The government should ensure the cultivation of students' non-cognitive skills by implementing policies, allocating funds, as well as promoting and raising awareness about the significance of these skills.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.