ArticleBMC health services research2026
Prolonged return to work and hampered work ability: insights from a scoping review on the impact of long COVID on healthcare workers job performance.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare workers (HCWs) may have a higher risk of developing long COVID due to greater exposure to COVID-19, with symptoms extending beyond the acute phase impacting their daily living activities and job performance.
aimsTo systematically map the existing literature on the impact of long COVID on HCWs' job performance, focusing on their time to return to work and work ability.
methodsA scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidance included peer-reviewed studies in English or Spanish (January 2020-December 2024). Four databases were searched. Experimental, epidemiological and qualitative studies were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened records. Methodological quality was appraised using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal tool (MMAT).
resultsNineteen studies were included, mainly European and predominantly cross-sectional. Long COVID was most often defined as symptoms lasting ≥ 3 months. Among HCWs with prior infection or whole-staff samples, prevalence ranged from 10% to 74%, with multiple reports above 50%. Thirteen studies evaluated RTW, with 19-63% resumed work within six months, commonly with restrictions, while around one in five remained unable to work in some cohorts. Full-time employment decreased markedly (e.g., 57% pre-infection vs 31% at follow-up). Between 16% and 40% required workplace adjustments such as reduced hours, reassignment, or avoidance of night shifts. Sixteen studies reported diminished work ability compared with pre-infection or unaffected peers. Greater symptom burden, particularly cognitive impairment and fatigue, consistently predicted poorer outcomes. One study estimated a mean of 223 days to reach current work-ability levels. Older age, depression, comorbidity, and acute disease severity were recurrent associated factors while evidence for gender and job category was inconsistent.
conclusionsLong COVID delays RTW and reduces work ability in HCWs. Health services should plan long-term occupational follow-up, flexible reintegration pathways, and targeted accommodations while higher-quality longitudinal research refines risk and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.