Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380987›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Leading healthcare improvement: an implementation strategy.

Kelley Arredondo, Anthony Ecker, Lindsay Vaclavik, Jacquelene Shahin, Ashley Thompson, Molly Horstman, David Ramsey, Kyler M Godwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kelley ArredondoHouston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, MEDVAMC 156, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, USA. Kelley.Arredondo@bcm.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6657-3379
Anthony EckerHouston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, MEDVAMC 156, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, USA.
Lindsay VaclavikHouston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, MEDVAMC 156, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, USA.
Jacquelene ShahinHouston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, MEDVAMC 156, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, USA.
Ashley ThompsonHouston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, MEDVAMC 156, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, USA.
Molly HorstmanHouston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, MEDVAMC 156, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, USA.
David RamseyHouston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, MEDVAMC 156, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, USA.
Kyler M GodwinHouston VA HSR&D Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness, and Safety, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, MEDVAMC 156, 2002 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Quality Enhancement Research Initiative QIS 18-201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthcare professionals often implement quality improvement (QI) initiatives but lack training to implement and sustain QI initiatives. Leading Healthcare Improvement (LHI) is a course that combines principles from change management, team science, and leadership effectiveness into an implementation strategy to enable clinicians to lead sustainable change.

methodsLHI is a 6-session, 4-month interactive training. Learners work on an active QI project throughout the course. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to evaluate pre- and post-course changes in learners' self-reported confidence across five QI competencies.

resultsVeterans Healthcare Administration clinicians and fellows completed the LHI pre- (n = 111) and post-course (n = 74) evaluations with 70 responding to both evaluations. The 70 learners self-reported significantly increased confidence after the training in each of the QI competencies: communicating urgency (W = 56, p < 0.001), developing and leading interprofessional teams (W = 48, p < 0.001), creating and communicating project vision (W = 54, p < 0.001), developing strategies to remove barriers (W = 60, p < 0.001), and communicating project impacts to leadership (W = 62, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: LHI is an implementation strategy curriculum intended to support healthcare professionals in leading system-level changes. Its emphasis on key partner influence, interprofessional teamwork, and real-time project application may help address gaps in existing training and has the potential to strengthen capacity for sustained healthcare improvement.

Indexed as

LeadershipQuality ImprovementCurriculumHumansUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsChange managementImplementation strategyInterprofessional teamsLeadership trainingQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID42380987
PMCPMC13599253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.