Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380952›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2026

Next of kin involvement in mental health care services - a systematic participatory overview of evidence syntheses.

Peggy Prien, Sebastian Bayer, Susanne Kappesser, Nora Dietrich, Sven Speerforck, Johanna Kummetat, Sarah Schernau, Silvia Bahl, Franziska Vosseberg, Kolja Heumann and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Peggy PrienDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Sebastian BayerBrandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Center of Mental Health, Ruedersdorf, Germany.
Susanne KappesserBrandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Center of Mental Health, Ruedersdorf, Germany.
Nora DietrichBrandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Center of Mental Health, Ruedersdorf, Germany.
Sven SpeerforckDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Johanna KummetatDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
Sarah SchernauBrandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Center of Mental Health, Ruedersdorf, Germany.
Silvia BahlBrandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Center of Mental Health, Ruedersdorf, Germany.
Franziska VossebergBrandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Center of Mental Health, Ruedersdorf, Germany.
Kolja Heumann *Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Center of Mental Health, Ruedersdorf, Germany.
Sebastian von Peter *Brandenburg Medical School, Immanuel Center of Mental Health, Ruedersdorf, Germany. sebastian.vonpeter@mhb-fontane.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of the involvement of next of kin (NOK) in mental health treatment settings is widely recognized. Yet, interventions to involve NOK are not sufficiently implemented in clinical practice - a situation that the German-based collaborative-participatory research project "Involvement of Next of Kin in Psychiatric Care" (PazAng) aims to change. This overview intends to systematically collect and evaluate the existing evidence syntheses (=ES) on interventions, programs, and approaches for the involvement of NOK in the field of mental health care to create a foundation for their improved implementation in future.

methodsThe study follows a collaborative-participatory approach to ensure the grounding of the results in diverse and experiential perspectives throughout the research process. An overview of ES is conducted, focusing on the types of interventions and mental disorder for which NOK involvement has been evaluated, the types of outcomes assessed, and the inferences to be drawn on the effectiveness.

resultsThe search identified 1340 publications of which 50 ES were included after full text screening. Interventions were heterogenous in relation to their theoretical underpinnings, components, setting, delivery format, the delivering staff, duration, and frequency. The component most assessed was psychoeducation. Outcomes varied widely, especially for the NOK involved. Overall, positive effects on both NOK and PIT were reported.

conclusionThe heterogeneity of NOK interventions relate to fundamental contingencies: first, to individuum-centrism of the mental health care system with a strong bias towards individualized over social-relational explanation models. Second, to a lack of research on multi-person setting interventions that also pay attention on how to renumerate and institutionally implement them in sustainable ways. PROSPERO ID: CRD42024595639.

Indexed as

CaregiversFamilyMental DisordersMental Health ServicesHumansCaregiverCaregiver involvementInvolvementMental healthParticipationPsychiatry

Identifiers

PMID42380952
PMCPMC13321765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.