ArticleBMC research notes2026
Inefficacy of a novel osmotic associative learning assay in C. elegans.
Article in BMC research notes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn this study, we developed and tested a novel osmotic associative assay for facilitating the study of associative learning circuits with constrained sensory inputs in Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans).
resultsHyperosmolarity, the unconditioned stimulus, was paired with benzaldehyde, an attractive odorant here used as a conditioned stimulus, in order to train an association between hyperosmolarity and odor. It was hypothesized that animals conditioned in hyperosmotic conditions for 90 min would show reduced chemotaxis to benzaldehyde compared to control animals. Results suggest that, following exposure to a hyperosmolar 500mM fructose solution, C. elegans chemotaxis to benzaldehyde was impaired. At more moderate hyperosmolarity, worms failed to learn to associate hyperosmolarity with benzaldehyde - i.e., there was no difference between chemotaxis index values of conditioned and naive worms in any of the fructose concentrations. Thus, our results both suggest that 90-minute associative learning assays in C. elegans may not succeed with hyperosmolarity as an unconditioned stimulus, and provide a cautionary note that researchers using hyperosmotic solutions in worm behavior assays should be cognizant of potential effects on naïve chemotaxis behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.