ArticleBMC public health2026
Global suicide trends across major religions from 2000 to 2021.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuicide claims over 700,000 lives annually. Religious beliefs may influence suicide risk, yet large-scale, cross-national comparisons remain limited.
methodsThis retrospective, ecological study analyzed age-standardized suicide rates of 185 countries over a 22-year period (2000-2021) using World Health Organization (WHO) mortality data. Countries were classified by dominant religion, including Buddhism, Christianity, Hinduism, Islam, and Others, per Pew Research Center data, and by income level (World Bank) and region (WHO). Suicide numbers were estimated by multiplying suicide rates and UN population data. Poisson regression models, controlling for income, region, and year, examined the association between religion and suicide rates.
resultsIslam showed the lowest suicide rates across total, male, and female populations. Poisson analysis confirmed significantly lower risk for Muslims (total population RR = 0·37, 95% CI: 0·33-0·42) than Buddhists as a base. Hindu populations, particularly females, exhibited the highest suicide rates (total population RR = 2·02, 95%CI:1·82-2·24), (female population RR = 4·74, 95%CI: 4·26-5·28). Christianity showed high male suicide rates descriptively, but adjusted risk decreased after accounting for region. (total population RR = 0·65, 95%CI: 0·57-0·75).
conclusionsOur findings indicate a statistical association between a country's dominant religion and its suicide rates. The lower rates observed in Islamic-majority countries might be related to factors such as religious prohibitions and community cohesion, while the high rates among females in Hindu-majority nations could be linked to specific socio-cultural pressures. Given the study's cross-sectional ecological design, these results merely highlight associations and cannot establish causality. Further research is necessary to elucidate the complex mechanisms underlying these observations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.