ArticleStem cell research & therapy2026
Orthodontic loading modulates epithelial progenitor dynamics and enamel formation in the mouse mandibular incisor.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdult stem cells (SCs) maintain tissue homeostasis through a balance of self-renewal and differentiation regulated by biochemical and mechanical cues. While biochemical pathways are well studied, the in vivo mechanisms by which external forces influence SCs and their progeny remain poorly understood. The continuously growing mouse incisor offers a tractable model for investigating these mechanisms because dental epithelial stem cells (DESCs) reside in a spatially restricted apical niche, and their progeny undergo stereotyped proliferation and differentiation along the apical-incisal axis. We investigated how intrusive mechanical loading affects dental epithelial cell kinetics and enamel regeneration during injury repair.
methodsA modified orthodontic tooth movement device was adapted to apply controlled intrusive forces (0.05-0.5 N) to the mouse mandibular incisor. To stimulate regeneration, the incisal tip was trimmed, and mice were subjected to force application for three days, followed by recovery after device removal. Dental epithelial responses were evaluated using histology, dual EdU/BrdU labeling, in situ hybridization, and micro-computed tomography. Expression of proliferation (Ccnb1) and differentiation (Igfbpl1) markers, as well as nuclear localization of the mechano-responsive transcription co-factor YAP, were analyzed.
resultsForces ≥ 0.2 N caused adverse health effects, whereas 0.05 N induced consistent epithelial changes without systemic consequences. At 0.05 N loading, incisors showed delayed regeneration and hypomineralized enamel. The apical epithelium exhibited folds, tears, reduced proliferation, and premature amelogenin expression. These effects reversed after load removal, coinciding with restored proliferation and enamel deposition. Gene expression analysis revealed apical-incisal shifts in Ccnb1 and Igfbpl1 domains, consistent with altered cell kinetics. Mechanistically, loading decreased nuclear YAP localization in the central body of the labial cervical loop, suggesting a role for this mechanosensitive pathway in mediating the cellular response to mechanical force.
conclusionsThis study presents an in vivo model for examining mechanical influences on dental epithelial progenitor cells. Intrusive loading suppresses proliferation, promotes precocious differentiation, and alters epithelial architecture. These findings support a role for mechanical cues in modulating tissue regeneration and provide a framework for future mechanistic studies in tooth biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.