ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026
Neuromechanical synergy patterns explain metabolic efficiency differences during the sit-to-walk transition.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The sit-to-walk (STW) transition is a key component of the Timed Up and Go test, yet the neuromuscular and cross-modal coordination features associated with metabolic cost during STW remain incompletely understood. This study developed a simulation-informed synergy analysis framework combining OpenSim-Umberger metabolic estimation, non-negative matrix factorization (NMF), and mixed-matrix factorization (MMF). Seventy-one healthy participants performed STW trials with kinematics, ground reaction forces, and eight-channel surface electromyography recorded. Model-derived metabolic cost was estimated using participant-specific musculoskeletal simulations, and an STW oxygen-consumption agreement analysis in a validation subsample supported the metabolic estimation workflow. Participants were stratified into residual-based metabolic-cost groups after adjustment for body mass, height, and sex. Across groups, joint kinematics and simulation-derived muscle-level outputs were broadly comparable. NMF identified localized differences in temporal activation coefficients after correction for the number of synergies, with group effects confined to early and late time windows rather than extending across the full analyzed cycle. Exploratory NMF weight comparisons further suggested potential differences in selected muscle weights. MMF characterized non-negative temporal coefficients and cross-modal EMG-biomechanical weight patterns; corrected analyses of MMF temporal coefficients identified limited, localized differences in selected MMF synergies, and exploratory weight comparisons indicated localized differences in selected EMG and biomechanical channel-synergy combinations. These findings suggest that residual-based metabolic-cost phenotypes during STW are associated with localized synergy-related features under broadly similar external movement patterns. The proposed framework provides a healthy-reference and hypothesis-generating approach for examining subtle internal coordination features linked to model-estimated metabolic cost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.