SynthesisBMC public health2026
Systematic review of sexual violence against sex workers: implications for mental and sexual health.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSex workers worldwide experience different forms of violence and stigma that increase the risk of adverse health outcomes. It is assumed that a discriminatory, criminalizing context as well as intersectional stigma increases the risk of sexual violence for sex workers. We aim to answer the following questions: (1) What types of sexual violence do sex workers experience and (2) how frequently do they encounter it? (3) To what extent are these types of sexual violence associated with mental and sexual health conditions? (4) Are these associations moderated by legislative models?
methodsIn a preregistered systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42024503922), scientific databases, references from meta-analyses, and publications from sex work organizations were searched. A total k = 207 quantitative and qualitative studies (N = 157,991) published since 2013 were summarized meta-analytically and narratively.
resultsSex workers experience sexual violence across various contexts, with quantitative records identifying rape as the most prevalent form. Qualitative findings document varied forms of sexual violence including non-penetrative acts, sexual harassment, technology-facilitated sexual violence, and sexual neglect. The lifetime prevalence of sexual violence is 26.3% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 22.0-31.0). Mental health conditions (depressive, post-traumatic stress symptoms, and suicidality) were associated with sexual violence: OR [95% CI] = 1.85 [1.58-2.16], p < .001, as were alcohol and other recreational drugs: OR [95% CI] = 1.95 [1.59-2.38], p < .001. Both sexually transmitted infections, including HIV (OR [95% CI] = 1.36 [1.11-1.66], p = .003) and reproductive health related outcomes (OR [95% CI] = 1.76 [1.18-2.63], p = .013) were significantly associated with sexual violence. Potential moderation by legislative model could not be detected due to insufficient data.
conclusionThis systematic review suggests sexual violence against sex workers as a critical human rights issue. However, the generalisability of these findings is constrained by substantial statistical heterogeneity and limited representativeness within the current literature, which remains focused predominantly on cisgender women in in-person sex work. This calls for redefining sexual violence with input by sex workers and addressing structural inequities to aid in destigmatizing sex work and reducing social inequities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.