Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380885›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

The classification of walking and phases of gait using EEG: a scoping review.

Cormac Ryan, Conor White, Olive Lennon

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The classification of walking and phases of gait using EEG: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cormac RyanSchool Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science , University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. cormac.ryan5@ucdconnect.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-6081-7630
Conor WhiteSchool Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science , University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1524-3673
Olive LennonSchool Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science , University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7005-3616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have the potential to optimise robotic-assisted gait rehabilitation by closing the loop between user and device. Developing such systems requires reliable methods for classifying walking and its component phases to enable real-time feedback. However, research into electroencephalography (EEG)-based gait classification remains limited, with no consensus on optimal methodological or classification approaches. This scoping review aimed to identify (i) gait states and phases classified to date, (ii) methodological processes employed in gait and gait phase classification and (iii) classification systems used. A pre-registered scoping review was conducted. SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Studies investigating EEG-based gait or gait phase classification, with or without robotic assistance were included. From 15,915 unique studies, 62 were included. Ten studies classified gait phases, with most limited to two phases (n = 5). The majority involved treadmill walking (n = 8), with only two investigating overground walking. Only one study addressed gait phase classification (swing versus stance) during robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT), achieving a maximum accuracy of 83.06%. No studies investigated gait phase classification in a neurological population. Almost all gait phase studies used offline analysis (n = 9). One study performed online analysis, achieving an accuracy of 82.3% for swing versus stance classification. The remaining studies classified gait against other forms of movement. Sensorimotor area electrodes were most frequently used for classification and sensorimotor regions consistently exhibited gait-related discriminative EEG features. Collation of methodological processes identified little consensus within the field. Furthermore, classification accuracy was variable. This scoping review summarises EEG-based gait classification systems, highlighting the need for methodological consensus. Knowledge gaps include the classification of more than two gait phases during free overground walking and limited RAGT-based studies. Notably, gait phase classification research in neurological populations is entirely lacking. Addressing these gaps is critical to advance BCIs for gait rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesElectroencephalographyGaitWalkingHumansRoboticsBrain–computer interface (BCI)Electroencephalography (EEG)ExoskeletonGait phase classificationNeurorehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID42380885
PMCPMC13587400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.