ArticleBMC medical education2026
Melody of genes: design and implementation of an interdisciplinary medical humanities course to enhance empathy, humanistic literacy, and professional identity in Chinese medical students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMedical humanities education is recognized as essential for fostering empathy, professional identity, and humanistic literacy in future physicians. However, in China, existing medical humanities courses often lack effective interdisciplinary integration, rely primarily on passive lectures delivered by humanities faculty with limited clinical connection. There is an urgent need for evidence-based interdisciplinary curricula to cultivate medical students' empathy, humanistic literacy, and professional identity.
methodsWe developed and implemented an interdisciplinary medical humanities course "Melody of Genes", which employs a student-centered flipped‑classroom, discussion‑based model co-taught by medical and arts instructors. A single-group post-course observational study was conducted over three rounds (2022-2024), enrolling 113 medical undergraduates. Quantitative data were collected using an anonymous post‑course questionnaire (Cronbach's α = 0.821), and qualitative data from students' written reflections and final reports were analyzed using thematic analysis.
resultsOf 109 valid respondents (96.5% response rate), 101 (92.7%) reported perceived improvements in humanistic and philosophical literacy; 91 (83.5%) reported enhanced self-learning ability and critical thinking; and 92 (84.4%) reported increased empathy for patients and stronger professional identity as future physicians. Thematic analysis revealed that students valued the interdisciplinary discussions, the integration of real-clinical perspectives, and the opportunity for reflective writing.
conclusionsAn interdisciplinary medical humanities course using co-teaching, flipped classroom, and formative assessment is feasible and associated with positive self‑perceived improvements in empathy, humanistic literacy, and professional identity among Chinese medical undergraduates. These findings offer a replicable model for the construction and innovation of medical humanities curriculum in Chinese medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.