ArticleBMC health services research2026
Defensive medicine practices and attitudes toward malpractice among physicians in Jordan: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDefensive medicine (DM) refers to clinical practices motivated primarily by perceived medicolegal risk rather than patient benefit. In Jordan, evidence remains limited regarding physicians' defensive practices, awareness of defensive medicine as a formal concept, understanding of the 2018 Medical Liability Law, and attitudes toward malpractice litigation.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among a convenience sample of 211 physicians in Jordan between August 2023 and March 2024. A structured questionnaire assessed DM practices (10-item scale), attitudes toward malpractice litigation (5-item scale), familiarity with defensive medicine, self-rated understanding of the 2018 Medical Liability Law, litigation exposure, insurance status, and perceived patient pressure. Multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to examine factors associated with defensive medicine and attitude scores.
resultsDefensive medicine was reported by 84.4% of physicians, with a low-to-moderate overall intensity (mean item score across the 10 DM items : 2.1 ± 0.54 on the original 1-5 scale). Assurance behaviors predominated, particularly additional diagnostic testing perceived as precautionary or unnecessary (59.3%). Only 30.8% were familiar with the term "defensive medicine", and 60.7% rated their understanding of the 2018 Medical Liability Law as poor. In the multivariable analysis, younger age (B = -0.34, p = 0.024), prior malpractice litigation experience (B = 4.89, p < 0.001), and perceiving litigation as a personal attack (B = -1.18, p = 0.012) were independently associated with higher defensive medicine scores (R² = 0.178). Specialty risk category was not independently associated with defensive medicine after adjustment. In the attitude model, familiarity with defensive medicine (B = 0.82, p = 0.028) and lower defensive medicine scores (B = -0.06, p = 0.047) were associated with higher attitude scores toward malpractice litigation (R² = 0.132).
conclusionDefensive medicine was common among physicians in this sample and was expressed mainly through assurance-type behaviors. The findings suggest that defensive practices may be more closely associated with perceived professional vulnerability, prior litigation experience, and threat-related perceptions than with specialty risk category or self-rated legal understanding alone. Given the cross-sectional design and convenience sampling, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and require confirmation in larger, more representative studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.