ArticleBMC anesthesiology2026
Clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block in unilateral cervicothoracic myofascial pain syndrome: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMyofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the cervicothoracic region is a common cause of chronic neck and upper back pain that often shows limited response to conservative therapies. The recently described serratus posterior superior intercostal plane block (SPSIPB) targets the fascial plane between the serratus posterior superior and intercostal muscles and may provide effective regional analgesia. However, its long-term clinical efficacy in MPS has not been systematically evaluated. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ultrasound-guided SPSIPB in patients with unilateral cervicothoracic MPS.
methodsThis single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided SPSIPB in patients with unilateral cervicothoracic MPS. A total of 75 patients treated between June 2024 and May 2025 were included. Pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale [NRS]) was assessed at baseline, 1 h, 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months. Functional disability (Neck Disability Index [NDI]) and quality of life (EQ-5D-5 L) were evaluated in a predefined subset. A linear mixed-effects model including all available observations was used for primary analysis, with post-baseline co-interventions incorporated as a time-varying covariate. Sensitivity analyses included per-protocol, complete-case, and conservative missing-not-at-random (MNAR) approaches.
resultsNRS scores decreased significantly over time, with the greatest reduction observed at 1 h and continued improvement at 6 months (adjusted mean change - 2.73, 95% CI - 3.18 to - 2.28; p < 0.001). Clinically meaningful improvement, defined as ≥ 50% reduction in NRS, was observed in 90.7%, 34.7%, and 28.0% of patients at 1 h, 4 weeks, and 6 months, respectively. Functional disability improved significantly, with NDI reductions of - 7.83, - 7.37, and - 6.67 at 4 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months, respectively (all p < 0.001). EQ-5D-5 L scores also improved significantly across all follow-up time points (all p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses demonstrated consistent findings across all models, including conservative MNAR assumptions. No major complications were observed.
conclusionsUltrasound-guided SPSIPB was associated with rapid pain reduction and continued improvements in disability and quality of life up to six months in this retrospective cohort. No major complications were documented. These findings support further prospective controlled evaluation of SPSIPB as a potential interfascial approach for cervicothoracic MPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.