Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380830›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Early exposure to aggressive and prosocial television content and children's social and behavioral development from ages 2 to 8.

Cara S Swit, Megan Gath, Jenna Gawn, Jennifer Smith, Mia A McLean, Ying Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cara S SwitFaculty of Health, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand. cara.swit@canterbury.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7198-5869
Megan GathChild Wellbeing Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand.
Jenna GawnChild Wellbeing Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand.
Jennifer SmithChild Wellbeing Research Institute, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand.
Mia A McLeanAuckland University of Technology, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Ying WangAuckland University of Technology, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly childhood is a sensitive developmental period during which television exposure is widespread which may include portrayals of aggressive and prosocial behavior. Although prior research suggests modest associations between media content and child behavior, most studies focus on screen time rather than content quality and typically examine aggressive and prosocial content in isolation. From a public health perspective, there is limited longitudinal evidence on how early exposure to aggressive and prosocial television content, and their co-occurrence, relates to children's social and behavioral development over time.

methodsData were drawn from the Growing Up in New Zealand longitudinal cohort. Children's exposure to aggressive and prosocial television content at age 2 was assessed using fine-grained content coding of children's most frequently watched television programmes. Children's conduct problems, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior were assessed at ages 2, 4.5, and 8 using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (N = 5,338). A series of latent growth curve models were estimated to examine associations between aggressive content exposure, prosocial content exposure, their interaction, and overall television viewing time, with children's initial levels and developmental trajectories of social and behavioral outcomes.

resultsChildren's television exposure frequently included both aggressive and prosocial behaviors, highlighting the heterogeneity of content viewed by young children. Higher exposure to aggressive television content was associated with higher levels of conduct and peer relationship problems at age 2, though these associations were attenuated after accounting for overall television viewing time, which predicted a steeper decline in conduct problems across childhood. Exposure to prosocial television content, the co-occurrence of aggressive and prosocial content, and all interaction terms with overall television viewing time were not associated with any outcome at age 2 or over time.

conclusionsOverall, the findings suggest that early television content exposure is associated with behavioral differences early in development, though associations with developmental change across childhood did not contribute beyond the contribution of total television viewing time. From a public health perspective, these findings highlight the importance of considering television content quality alongside viewing quantity, recognizing that both are embedded within broader family and developmental contexts that warrant further investigation.

Indexed as

AggressionChild BehaviorChild DevelopmentSocial BehaviorTelevisionChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMedia ExposureNew ZealandAggressive mediaEarly childhoodGrowing up in New ZealandMiddle childhoodProsocial mediaTelevisionTelevision contentViolent media

Identifiers

PMID42380830
PMCPMC13584371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.