SynthesisBMC cancer2026
Immune-related adverse events with cancer clinical benefits: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immune-related adverse events and clinical outcomes in patients with solid tumors treated with adebrelimab: a real-world exploratory study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGrowing research have reported an association of the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and clinical benefits in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatments, but the findings remain controversial. The aim of this study is to identify whether the incidence of irAEs and their subtypes undergoing ICIs treatment is associated with enhanced efficacy and survival benefits in all solid tumors.
methodsCochrane Library, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched from database inception and December 31, 2023. Two reviewers independently extracted data and reviewed the quality items using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale criteria, and resolved any discrepancies by consensus discussion with third reviewer. We performed the systematic review and meta-analysis in compliance with the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. The main outcomes were irAEs incidence, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsA total of 184 articles involving a total of 63,780 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled incidence of irAEs in this meta-analysis was 37.3% (95%CI: 34.4%-40.3%). The occurrence of irAEs was associated with increased ORR (RR, 2.32 [95%CI, 2.02-2.67]; I
conclusionsThe intimate association was observed between the development of irAEs and increased response rate and improved survival benefits in patients who treated with ICIs, and may have useful prognostic value in ICIs therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.