Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380815›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2026

Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) disposal practices in Tokha, Nepal: a health belief model study.

Govinda Bhandari, Urmila Gharti Magar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Govinda BhandariProgressive Sustainable Developers Nepal (PSD-Nepal), Kathmandu, Nepal. drgovindabhandari@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4358-8102
Urmila Gharti MagarProgressive Sustainable Developers Nepal (PSD-Nepal), Kathmandu, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnused and expired Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) are emerging environmental contaminants that may pose serious risks to human health and the environment. In Nepal, household and pharmacy level waste disposal behaviors remain poorly documented.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted in Tokha municipality among 298 households and 53 pharmacy retailers. Structured questionnaires included data on: (i) demographic features, (ii) usage and storage patterns of PPCPs, and (iii) their disposal practices. This study was based on the Health Belief Model (HBM) constructs. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, Spearman's correlation analysis, and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).

resultsUnsafe storage and improper disposal practices being common among households and pharmacy retailers. About 41.6% of the households stored unused or expired pharmaceuticals, primarily analgesics and skincare products that accounted 63.1% and 77.5%, respectively. Expired PPCPs were mostly disposed of in household garbage containers (88.9%) or burned (12.8%), while only 4.7% were returned to pharmacies. Of the HBM constructs, self-efficacy was the strongest predictor of response to cues for safe disposal behaviors (β = 0.184). Of all pharmacy retailers, only 17% were aware of disposal regulations and facilities. Major challenges included the lack of take-back systems (37.8%) and limited disposal facilities (24.5%). The study highlighted significant challenges in the management of unused and expired PPCPs among households and pharmacy retailers in Tokha municipality.

conclusionsHouseholds and pharmacy retailers reported unsatisfactory waste disposal practices. Community-based awareness drives and pharmaceutical waste management modules boost self-efficacy by giving people the knowledge and confidence to safely handle and manage unused and expired PPCPs. In a case there are accessible municipal collection systems, pharmacy- or municipal-level take-back points, and clear regulatory mechanisms in the country, it becomes easier for individuals to accelerate that confidence into safety practices to reduce environmental deterioration and protect public health in Nepal.

Indexed as

Health Belief ModelPersonal Care ProductsRefuse DisposalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNepalPharmaceutical PreparationsSurveys and QuestionnairesPersonal Care ProductsPharmaceutical PreparationsDisposal practicesHealth Belief ModelHousehold and pharmacy surveyPPCPs

Identifiers

PMID42380815
PMCPMC13625299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.