ArticleBMC public health2026
Hungry for equity in the Green Mountain State: food insecurity among college students in Vermont.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are limited data on food insecurity among college students from different marginalized backgrounds, both in Vermont and other predominantly White spaces, and what their institutions could do to improve food security and other basic needs. Thus, the aims of this study were to 1) examine food insecurity prevalence and its correlates among underrepresented college students, 2) assess their reasons for using campus food pantries and strategies for improving access to culturally appropriate foods on campus, and 3) determine their perspectives regarding how their institutions can address their basic needs.
methodsUsing a mixed methods cross-sectional research design, a convenience sample of full-time students or trainees ages 18 and older enrolled at four institutions of higher education in Vermont, United States, were recruited through flyers, course announcements, newsletters, listservs, and social media posts. An online survey provided estimates of food insecurity, on-campus food pantry use, and participant perspectives on institutional strategies to address basic needs through open-ended questions. Food insecurity was assessed by the 10-item United States Department of Agriculture food security survey module. Descriptive statistics assessed frequencies and percentages along with means and standard deviations. Binary logistic regression was conducted to estimate the odds of food insecurity. Inductive coding was used to analyze qualitative data and identify emergent themes.
resultsAround 40% of all participants experienced food insecurity in the past year, with higher odds observed in students aged ≥ 30, Pell Grant recipients, first-generation students, Black students, and those who used a food pantry. The most cited reason for using a campus food pantry was ease of getting to the pantry while lack of awareness was the most reported barrier. Over 50% of participants recommended gathering feedback from students about their preferences to improve access to culturally appropriate foods. Common themes from qualitative analyses included: food access support, safe and affordable housing access, mental health and healthcare access, financial aid access, reliable and affordable transportation access, non-financial academic support, and general support services.
conclusionsInstitutions should prioritize food assistance programs targeting college students and incorporate mental health care, housing support, and financial aid for comprehensive safety nets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.