ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2026
Gastrointestinal microbiota of sympatric pipefish (Syngnathus typhle) and stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) indicate trade-off associated with evolutionary stomach loss.
Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnimal gastrointestinal tracts generally evolved towards a diverse and spatially structured organ system for efficient food digestion. In it, food is chemically broken down and bacterial load reduced by gastric acid in the stomach, acting as a "gatekeeper" for microbes entering the intestines where chyme nutrients and water are absorbed. The natural microbiota across gastrointestinal tract zones support digestion, compete with ingested pathogens and acts itself as an immune stimulus. Despite its important role, several lineages of fish, such as pipefishes, have secondarily lost their stomach and evolved agastric digestion, with unknown consequences to their intestines' microbiomes.
resultsHere, we test how stomach loss might affect the microbiome by investigating the fore-, mid- and hindgut's autochthonous microbiota of the Baltic Sea broadnosed pipefish, Syngnathus typhle, and comparing it to the stomach, fore- and hindgut's autochthonous microbiota of the sympatric and ecologically similar three-spine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Using 16S-rRNA gene sequencing and qPCR, we show that microbial abundance is high in the stomach, accompanied by high alpha diversity, but low in the intestine of G. aculeatus, although microbial diversity remains at intermediate levels - a pattern almost inversed in S. typhle. G. aculeatus' stomach has the most distinct microbiota across gastrointestinal zones; however, this species' intestines' microbes are also found in S. typhle. In contrast, the pipefish's hindgut is the most distinct zone, and many microbes shared across its whole intestine are not found in the G. aculeatus.
conclusionsOur data supports the notion of the stomach and its distinct microbiome being an immunological gatekeeper for the gut, but also suggests that S. typhle might benefit from the additional microbes as many indicator taxa are suspected to act as mutualistic symbionts. Stomach-loss may therefore be a trade-off between improved chemical digestion capabilities and an immunological gate-keeper vs. improved microbial digestion and increased immune stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.