ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Isolation and identification of major bacterial contaminants in beef and abattoir environments at Nekemte municipal abattoir, western Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study, 2024-25.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFoodborne disease caused by bacterial contamination of meat represent a major global public health challenge, particularly in developing countries where hygienic practices during meat processing are often inadequate.
objectivesThis study aimed to isolate and identify major bacterial contaminants from beef, abattoir equipment and workers hands at Nekemte municipal abattoir, western Ethiopia.
methodsA cross sectional study was conducted from November 2024 to January 2025. A total of 92 samples were collected, including meat (n = 37), workers' hand swabs (n = 30) and knife swabs (n = 25). Standard bacteriological culture techniques and biochemical tests were used for pathogen identification. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Chi-square tests were performed to assess associations, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.
resultsThe overall prevalence of bacterial contamination was 57% (52/92). Knife swabs showed the highest contamination rate (64%), followed by workers' hand swabs (57%) and meat samples (51%). Salmonella spp. were the most frequently isolated pathogens (42%), followed by Presumptive Staphylococcus spp. (29%) and Escherichia coli (29%). No statistically significant difference in bacterial contamination was observed among the different sample types (p = 0.615).
conclusionThe high prevalence of bacterial contamination indicates inadequate hygienic practices in the abattoir. Strengthening sanitation measures, implementing structured training programs and adopting standardized food safety systems are recommended to improve meat safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.