ArticleNeuroinformatics2026
Metabolically Faithful 3D PET Restoration via Volumetric Swin Transformers.
Article in Neuroinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) diagnostic precision is often compromised by low spatial resolution. Deep learning restoration models tend to sacrifice quantitative accuracy for visual sharpness, and most are trained on a single fixed degradation profile, limiting generalization across scanners. This paper presents a metabolically faithful 3D restoration framework pairing a volumetric extension of SwinFIR with two innovations: (1) a composite metabolic-aware loss enforcing structural, distributional, and frequency-domain agreement with the ground truth, and (2) a stochastic degradation augmentation strategy that randomizes point spread function parameters, voxel sampling, and counting noise during training, exposing the model to a distribution of simulated scanner-like degradations rather than a single fixed simulation. Evaluated on NeuroEXPLORER data, the proposed method outperforms baselines with a Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) of 0.843, Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR) of 27.08 dB, and Normalized Root Mean Squared Error (NRMSE) of 0.117, while maintaining metabolic fidelity (Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) 0.948, Wasserstein distance 0.018). Ablation experiments confirm that stochastic degradation augmentation improves robustness over fixed-profile training. The framework recovers anatomical detail with only small but measurable regional SUVR biases (≤3.3%) in selected cortical regions, which are symmetric across diagnostic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42380725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.