Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380706›Full record

ReviewOdontology2026

Engineered biomaterial-based scaffolds for dentin-pulp complex regeneration: applications and biological performance-a scoping review.

Anderson Gomes Forte, Juan Vitor Costa Leite, Alana Pinto Caroso Souza, Fernanda Rafaela Ribeiro, Renally Bezerra Wanderley Lima, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Américo Bortolazzo Correr

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Odontology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anderson Gomes ForteDental Materials Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas (FOP/UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. andersongforte.ag@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3378-3754
Juan Vitor Costa LeiteDental Materials Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas (FOP/UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6069-6703
Alana Pinto Caroso SouzaDental Materials Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas (FOP/UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2743-3012
Fernanda Rafaela RibeiroDental Materials Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas (FOP/UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4963-662X
Renally Bezerra Wanderley LimaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4477-7850
Mário Alexandre Coelho SinhoretiDental Materials Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas (FOP/UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1932-2902
Américo Bortolazzo CorrerDental Materials Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas (FOP/UNICAMP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3306-7055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To map and summarize scientific evidence on engineered scaffolds for dentin-pulp complex regeneration. This scoping review followed the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and was registered in the Open Science Framework. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, complemented by grey literature searches. In vitro, in situ, and in vivo studies that evaluated scaffolds or other biomaterial-based strategies for guided tissue regeneration in the dentin-pulp complex were included. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and qualitative descriptive synthesis. Of the 357 records identified after duplicate removal, 44 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. Most were in vitro studies, followed by combined in vitro/in vivo and in vivo animal studies. The scaffolds included synthetic polymers, natural biomaterials, bioceramics, hybrid systems, and extracellular matrix-derived materials. Lyophilization and electrospinning were the most common fabrication techniques, although 3D printing, bioprinting, injectable systems, and self-assembling platforms were also explored. Overall, the studies showed favorable cytocompatibility, supporting cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, odontogenic differentiation, mineralized matrix deposition, and angiogenic potential. Bioactive functionalization further enhanced regenerative performance, while antimicrobial approaches demonstrated activity against clinically relevant endodontic pathogens and inhibition of biofilm formation. In vivo findings supported the formation of vascularized pulp-like tissue and dentin-like or mineralized structures, although the overall evidence remains predominantly preclinical. Scaffolds show potential for dentin-pulp regeneration by providing structural support and bioactive cues. Natural, synthetic, and hybrid systems consistently promote differentiation, mineral deposition, and pulp-like tissue formation.

Indexed as

Dentin-pulp complexGuided tissue regenerationScaffoldsTissue engineering

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.