ArticleTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2026
Implementing Project Optimus in Oncology Dosage Optimization: Where are We Now?
Article in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Determining the optimal dosage of oncology drugs is a critical component of drug development, as many anticancer agents are associated with high toxicity. With the emergence of targeted therapies and immunotherapies, the conventional concept that "more is better" may not apply, as higher doses do not necessarily yield greater efficacy and may compromise tolerability. In response to repeated post-approval dosage modifications, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) launched Project Optimus in 2021 to promote data-driven, patient-centered dosage optimization. Despite the release of the finalized FDA Guidance for Industry on Oncology Dosage Optimization in 2024, sponsors continue to face challenges in translating these recommendations into practice, due to the complexity in the development process of oncology drugs and the limitations of early-phase trials. To gain insight into current practices and challenges, the DahShu Innovative Designs Scientific Working Group (IDSWG) conducted an industry-wide survey among oncology statisticians in biopharmaceutical companies. The survey revealed a shift away from reliance on the maximum tolerated dose toward integrated strategies balancing efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and patient experience. This paper summarizes the findings from that survey and offers practical recommendations emphasizing cross-functional collaboration between statisticians and other functional members in early phase trials, adoption of innovative trial designs, and proactive regulatory engagement regarding dosage optimization strategies in clinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42380698What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.