ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2026
Integrating evolutionary and compositional features with ML and DL for robust and interpretable druggable protein prediction.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Druggable proteins are essential targets in contemporary therapeutic discovery, and their precise identification is necessary for the progression of rational drug design. Traditional biochemical screening techniques are costly, laborious, and protracted, whereas current computational models typically attain only moderate efficacy and seldom offer robust statistical validation or biological interpretability. To mitigate these limitations, we offer a hybrid computational approach that integrates evolutionary and compositional information by merging Average Block-based Position-Specific Scoring Matrix (AB-PSSM) characteristics with Dipeptide Composition (DPC) into a 600-dimensional representation. The hybrid feature space was assessed utilizing three machine learning algorithms (support vector machine, random forest, and XGBoost) alongside three deep learning architectures (CapsBiLSTM, ResCapsNetPlus, and ResNet1D) following a rigorous five-fold out-of-fold cross-validation protocol to guarantee fairness and reproducibility. A thorough assessment revealed that the hybrid attributes significantly surpassed individual descriptors, with the SVM and CapsBiLSTM classifiers attaining classification accuracies of 90% and ROC-AUC and PR-AUC values surpassing 95%. By integrating complementary evolutionary and compositional descriptors within a rigorously controlled out-of-fold validation framework, the proposed method improves predictive stability compared with previously reported sequence-based and ensemble learning predictors. Furthermore, unlike many existing approaches that primarily rely on accuracy-based evaluation, this study incorporates statistical significance testing and interpretable feature attribution, enabling both reliable generalization performance and biological interpretability. The robustness and reliability were further validated by statistical analyses, including DeLong's test, McNemar's test, and bootstrap confidence intervals, demonstrating that the observed enhancements were substantial and consistent. Furthermore, interpretability investigations employing SHAP feature attribution and t-SNE visualization underscored biologically significant sequence descriptors as pivotal factors influencing druggability, thus mitigating the "black box" constraint inherent in numerous deep learning methodologies. This study presents a statistically validated, interpretable, and high-performing framework for predicting druggable proteins, demonstrating competitive performance compared with existing machine learning and ensemble-based predictors while providing improved statistical reliability and interpretability, thereby establishing a clear basis for future applications in precision medicine and drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.