Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380673›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2026

Connectomic evidence that ordered activity drives neuromuscular network formation.

Yaron Meirovitch, Kai Kang, Ryan W Draft, Elisa C Pavarino, Maria Fernanda Henao Echeverri, Fuming Yang, Stephen G Turney, Daniel R Berger, Adi Peleg, Marta Montero-Crespo and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Yaron Meirovitch *Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. yaron.mr@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1946-8012
Kai Kang *Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Ryan W Draft *Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Elisa C PavarinoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Maria Fernanda Henao EcheverriDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9940-8704
Fuming YangDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7561-155X
Stephen G TurneyDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Daniel R BergerDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9677-6932
Adi PelegDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Marta Montero-CrespoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Yuelong WuDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Richard L SchalekDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2450-1718
Ju LuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA.
Jean LivetInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3079-4908
Juan-Carlos TapiaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jeff W LichtmanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. jeff@mcb.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-3212

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We reconstructed complete connectomes between motor neurons and muscle fibers in small mouse muscles from birth through successive stages of postnatal development, when synaptic reorganization is most prominent. During development, marked reductions in axonal branching produced an approximately 6.5-fold decrease in the number of axons innervating each neuromuscular junction (NMJ), culminating in single innervation of all NMJs. Surprisingly, many neonatal muscle fibers also had more than one NMJ site. Most, but not all, of these supernumerary NMJs were eliminated. The few multiNMJ fibers that remained in adults had two widely separated junctions innervated by axons that exerted similar contractile forces and therefore had similar activity patterns. Unexpectedly, the muscle connectome further showed that both the loss of axons from individual NMJs and the elimination of entire NMJs related to the recruitment order of the innervating axonal cohort, and that this relationship reflected a rank-ordered pattern of axonal co-innervation. These observations argue that both local intrajunctional and long-distance interjunctional synaptic competition are activity-mediated and that the structure of mature neural circuits arises from the activity patterns of developing circuits.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMotor NeuronsNerve NetNeuromuscular JunctionAnimalsAnimals, NewbornAxonsMiceMice, TransgenicMuscle, SkeletalNeurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID42380673
PMCPMC13433312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.