Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380657›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental management2026

Co-producing Knowledge on Ecosystem Services: A Multidimensional Participatory Mapping Study in the Kat River Catchment, South Africa.

Oghenekaro Nelson Odume, Esther Ahuoiza Seriki, Chenai Murata, Chika Felicitas Nnadozie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oghenekaro Nelson OdumeInstitute for Water Research (IWR), Rhodes University, Old Geology Building (Off Artillery Road), P.O Box 94, Makhanda (Grahamstown), 6140, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5220-3254
Esther Ahuoiza SerikiInstitute for Water Research (IWR), Rhodes University, Old Geology Building (Off Artillery Road), P.O Box 94, Makhanda (Grahamstown), 6140, South Africa. est.seriki@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6719-6277
Chenai MurataInstitute for Water Research (IWR), Rhodes University, Old Geology Building (Off Artillery Road), P.O Box 94, Makhanda (Grahamstown), 6140, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-3499
Chika Felicitas NnadozieInstitute for Water Research (IWR), Rhodes University, Old Geology Building (Off Artillery Road), P.O Box 94, Makhanda (Grahamstown), 6140, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6177-2627

Funding

African Water Resources Mobility Network (AWaRMN), which has received funding from the Intra-Africa Academic Mobility Scheme of the European Union. Grant No. 2019-1973/004-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystem services in peri-urban catchments are increasingly threatened by land-use intensification, infrastructure deficiencies, and climate variability, with significant implications for environmental management and community well-being. This study examines ecosystem services in the Kat River Catchment, Eastern Cape, South Africa, using a multidimensional participatory mapping approach to assess service types, perceived importance, perceived spatial and temporal changes in availability and quality. A total of 54 stakeholders, representing communities within the catchment (the Kat River Catchment Forum), commercial farmers, subsistence farmers, and non-farming households participated in this study. There were 23 participants in a participatory mapping workshop and 31 semi-structured interview respondents. Provisioning services such as water, reeds, wood, sand, fish, and medicinal plants were consistently rated as highly important to local livelihoods, while cultural services including spiritual and recreational uses were rated as moderately important. Most ecosystem services were perceived to have deteriorated since the year 2000, particularly water quality and availability, reeds used for craft production, and fish for food and recreation. Participants attributed these declines to climate variability, agricultural intensification, failing wastewater treatment infrastructure, and inadequate solid waste management. The findings demonstrate how participatory approaches can generate locally grounded evidence of ecosystem service degradation and identify governance and infrastructure gaps. Integrating local ecological knowledge into catchment management, strengthening wastewater treatment performance, and improving pollution control are critical for enhancing ecosystem service sustainability and supporting adaptive environmental management in peri-urban river systems.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemRiversAgricultureSouth AfricaWater QualityCultural servicesFreshwater systemsLocal ecological knowledgePerceived spatial and temporal ecological changesProvisioning services

Identifiers

PMID42380657
PMCPMC13319870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.