Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380499›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Numerical modeling of the hydrodynamic behavior of MgO-water nanofluid in plate-fin heat exchangers under varying operating conditions.

Abbas J Sultan, Ali A Yahya, Fadhl H Faraj, Narinderjit Singh Sawaran Singh, Dheyaa J Jasim, Laith S Sabri, Haydar A S Aljaafari, Mahmut Taner, Ali Mohammadi Hasanabad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abbas J SultanCollege of Chemical Engineering, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad, 10066, Iraq.
Ali A YahyaCollege of Chemical Engineering, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad, 10066, Iraq.
Fadhl H FarajCollege of Chemical Engineering, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad, 10066, Iraq.
Narinderjit Singh Sawaran SinghFaculty of Data Science and Information Technology, INTI International University, Persiaran Perdana BBN, Putra Nilai, Nilai, 71800, Malaysia.
Dheyaa J JasimCollege of Engineering, University of Al Maarif, Al Anbar, 31001, Iraq.
Laith S SabriCollege of Chemical Engineering, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad, 10066, Iraq.
Haydar A S AljaafariCollege of Chemical Engineering, University of Technology- Iraq, Baghdad, 10066, Iraq.
Mahmut TanerFaculty of Engineering and Architecture, Istanbul Gelisim University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ali Mohammadi HasanabadFast Computing Center, Shabihsazan Ati Pars, Tehran, Iran. alimohammadihasanabad@outlook.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This research examined the ability of an artificial neural network to predict flow behavior, defined by Reynolds number and pressure drop as functions of volume fraction and temperature, at fixed flow rates of 5, 8, and 11 LPM. The proposed framework was developed to address the nonlinear, interrelated thermo-compositional effects that influence flow inertia and pressure losses, without relying on predefined empirical relationships. The model's reliability and predictive performance were evaluated through 5-fold cross-validation, monitoring of learning errors, regression diagnostics, error quantification, and sensitivity analysis. Results from cross-validation indicated stable Reynolds number predictions at low and moderate flow rates, with mean RMSE values of 6.39 at 5 LPM and 6.16 at 8 LPM. At 11 LPM, the mean RMSE rises to 13.87, highlighting the greater sensitivity and complexity of inertia-dominated flow regimes. Conversely, predictions of pressure drop remained consistently accurate across all operating conditions, achieving mean RMSE values of 2.68 mbar, 0.56 mbar, and 0.94 mbar at 5, 8, and 11 LPM, respectively. Regression analysis confirmed a strong linear relationship between predicted and reference values for both outputs, with correlation coefficients exceeding 0.99 at low and moderate flow rates and remaining above 0.96 at the highest flow rate. Further analysis of relative and absolute errors indicated high predictive accuracy, with mean relative errors below 5% for Reynolds number and below 1.3% for pressure drop across all scenarios. Sensitivity analysis consistently identified temperature as the primary source of predictive variability, with volume fraction being the secondary contributor. Pressure drop showed significantly lower sensitivity than Reynolds number, suggesting a smoother, less nonlinear relationship with the governing inputs.

Indexed as

Artificial neural networkFlow rateHydrodynamic propertiesIndustrial and innovationPressure dropReynolds number

Identifiers

PMID42380499
PMCPMC13342442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.