ArticleScientific reports2026
Live music enhances self-reported audience immersion and physiological synchrony compared to live-streaming.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Before the late 19th century, experiencing music required being physically present with performing musicians. Since then, many methods have attempted to replicate this live experience, most recently livestreaming. It remains unclear to what extent livestreams can replicate the live experience for audience members. To address this, we directly compared audience responses (N = 296) to live and livestream performances of two concerts (one jazz, one classical). On arrival at the concert venue, participants were randomly assigned to be physically present in the performance space, or watching a simultaneous, professionally-filmed livestream in a separate room. Questionnaire responses revealed increased reported immersion; increased intent to listen again to the artist and increased intent to return to the venue in the physically present group. This group also had significantly increased levels of heart rate synchrony. In summary, being physically present was associated with an enhanced audience experience compared to viewing a livestream broadcast on all measures. We found no evidence that seating position affects the live experience, whereas for the livestream experience viewing angle (e.g., as altered by camera angle) does significantly impact the experience. Future research should examine which perceptual qualities are important for optimising experiences for both live and livestreamed concert audiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.