ArticleCommunications biology2026
Loss contexts enhance dorsolateral prefrontal interpersonal neural synchrony during successful human deceptive recommendations.
Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deception is an important social behavior because it can shape another person's choices while concealing the sender's true interests. Although people often respond differently when trying to gain rewards or avoid losses, it remains unclear how these contexts influence the shared brain processes that support deception during real interaction. Here we show that loss contexts make deception more frequent and more successful in human face-to-face communication. We study same-gender stranger dyads (18 female dyads) while sender gives recommendations that can either help or mislead the other under gain and loss contexts. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy to record brain activity from both people at the same time, we find that misleading recommendations in gain contexts are associated with stronger activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a frontal brain region involved in control and planning. In contrast, successful deception in loss contexts is associated with higher interpersonal brain synchrony in this region, defined as a greater increase in similarity between the two people's brain activity during interaction compared with rest. This synchrony predicts deception success, suggesting that deception depends on context-sensitive alignment between interacting brains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.