Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380463›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Loss contexts enhance dorsolateral prefrontal interpersonal neural synchrony during successful human deceptive recommendations.

Yaozhong Liu, Rui Huang, Xiaowei Gao, Jingao Zhang, Yuhao Jia, Jingyao Zheng, He Wang, Yingjie Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yaozhong Liu *Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Philosophy, Social Sciences-Huashang Key Laboratory of Neuroeconomics, Guangdong, China.
Rui Huang *School of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Hebei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2413-3297
Xiaowei GaoSchool of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Hebei, China.
Jingao ZhangSchool of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Hebei, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2709-3816
Yuhao JiaSchool of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Hebei, China.
Jingyao ZhengSchool of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Hebei, China.
He WangSchool of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Hebei, China. wanghe429@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1656-613X
Yingjie LiuSchool of Psychology and Mental Health, North China University of Science and Technology, Hebei, China. psyliuyingjie@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2201-840X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deception is an important social behavior because it can shape another person's choices while concealing the sender's true interests. Although people often respond differently when trying to gain rewards or avoid losses, it remains unclear how these contexts influence the shared brain processes that support deception during real interaction. Here we show that loss contexts make deception more frequent and more successful in human face-to-face communication. We study same-gender stranger dyads (18 female dyads) while sender gives recommendations that can either help or mislead the other under gain and loss contexts. Using functional near-infrared spectroscopy to record brain activity from both people at the same time, we find that misleading recommendations in gain contexts are associated with stronger activity in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a frontal brain region involved in control and planning. In contrast, successful deception in loss contexts is associated with higher interpersonal brain synchrony in this region, defined as a greater increase in similarity between the two people's brain activity during interaction compared with rest. This synchrony predicts deception success, suggesting that deception depends on context-sensitive alignment between interacting brains.

Indexed as

DeceptionDorsolateral Prefrontal CortexInterpersonal RelationsPrefrontal CortexAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMaleSocial BehaviorSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42380463
PMCPMC13683375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.