ArticleScientific reports2026
Intelligent adaptive frequency regulation of interconnected power networks under renewable uncertainty and time delays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel adaptive control framework for load frequency regulation (LFC) in modern power systems with renewable energy integration and communication delays. A Single Perceptron Proportional-Integral (SPPI) controller optimized using Harmony Search (HS) is designed for single-area systems, while a cascaded SPPI-PID structure is developed for two-area networks. Unlike conventional fixed-parameter controllers, the proposed approach adapts online to varying operating conditions and disturbances. Simulation studies under step load changes, random load variations, and wind power fluctuations demonstrate superior performance of the proposed controllers. For single-area systems, the SPPI controller achieves overshoot as low as [Formula: see text], settling times between 9 and 21 s, and IAE ranging from 0.00176 to 0.312. In two-area systems, the cascaded SPPI-PID controller reduces peak-to-peak deviations to [Formula: see text], with settling times from 3 to 109 s and IAE values between 0.00115 and 0.1854. A sensitivity analysis with ± 20% variations in inertia, load damping, and governor speed regulation confirms the robustness of the proposed approach. A frequency-domain robustness analysis using Bode plots further verifies satisfactory stability margins. In addition, a real-time validation has been performed to further confirm the practical applicability and real-world performance of the proposed control framework under realistic operating conditions. These results indicate that the HS-optimized SPPI and cascaded SPPI-PID controllers provide an effective, reliable, and robust solution for frequency regulation in modern interconnected power systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.