ArticleScientific reports2026
The Use of Botulinum Toxin Type A in Esophageal Atresia Management: a Randomized, Controlled, Investigator-blinded Feasibility and Exploratory Trial in Piglets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anastomotic strictures and leaks are severe complications following esophageal atresia (EA) repair. We hypothesized that esophageal injections of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) could mitigate these complications through muscle relaxation. This randomized, controlled, blinded animal trial evaluated the feasibility and safety of a long- and short-gap porcine EA model. Furthermore, the effect of BTX-A as a surgical adjunct on anastomotic outcomes were exploratory assessed. Twenty-four animals received BTX-A or saline pre- or intraoperative to a three- or one-centimeter esophageal resection and primary anastomosis. The primary feasibility endpoint was animal completion rate at postoperative day 14, while stricture severity was the primary exploratory outcome. Secondary exploratory outcomes were anastomotic leakage frequency, and biomechanical and histological characteristics. Animal completion rate was 62.5% (15/24). There was no difference in stricture severity between the intervention and control groups (Esophageal Anastomotic Stricture Index 0.41 [IQR 0.26-0.55] versus 0.35 [IQR 0.27-0.58]; p = 0.73). One animal in the control group suffered an anastomotic leak. Biomechanical properties and anastomotic healing did not differ. While the procedure was technically feasible, refinement is necessary to reduce attrition rate and establish a safe model for long-term evaluation. More studies are needed to determine whether BTX-A can provide a reduction in anastomotic complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.