Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380412›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Non-invasive estimation of hemoglobin using machine learning algorithms from i-PPG and PPG signals.

A S Kaviya Dharshini, J B Jeeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A S Kaviya DharshiniDepartment of Sensor and Biomedical Technology, School of Electronics and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamilnadu, India.
J B JeevaDepartment of Sensor and Biomedical Technology, School of Electronics and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, 632014, Tamilnadu, India. jbjeeva@vit.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant research works have been carried out in the area of non-invasive hemoglobin estimation in recent times. The current study compares the estimation of hemoglobin from two kinds of photoplethysmogram (PPG) signals with the results obtained from the clinical laboratory tests. They are t-PPG and i-PPG signals. The former is collected using a device that utilizes the MAX30102 sensor, and the latter is collected using a smartphone. For this purpose, twenty-one volunteers aged between 20 and 54 years participated in this study. The data was collected twice on the same day with 2 hours interval. Among the volunteers five of them provided their data once. The PPG signals collected were filtered and processed to remove the noise. The features based on optical attenuation were extracted from the signals. These along with the demographic information were fed into the machine learning algorithms. The Hb values were estimated using decision trees, boosted trees, bootstrap, NTanH and XGBoost. The XGBoost model outperformed the others. The results were obtained with the R-squared values of 0.9862, 0.9812 and RMSE of 0.0489 g/dL, 0.0329 g/dL for t-PPG signals and i-PPG, respectively.

Indexed as

HemoglobinsMachine LearningPhotoplethysmographyAdultAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedYoung AdultHemoglobinsBland altman analysisHemoglobinI-PPGML modelsPPGXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID42380412
PMCPMC13350754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.