ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
AI-driven model for early failure prediction after HIFU integrating immediate post-ablation ultrasound and clinical data.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHigh-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging focal therapy for localized prostate cancer, offering an alternative to radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy while balancing oncological control and functional preservation. However, early treatment failure remains a critical challenge, and tools to support early risk stratification are lacking. We developed a two-stage model integrating immediate post-ablation ultrasound with routinely available clinical variables to predict early recurrence (≤ 12 months) after HIFU.
methodsSeventy-two patients treated with HIFU were analyzed. In Stage 1, a deep-learning model (DenseNet121) analyzed immediate post-ablation ultrasound images to generate a patient-level probability of treatment failure. In Stage 2, this image-derived probability was combined with routinely available clinical variables (age, PSA density, ISUP grade, percentage of positive biopsy cores, and treated volume) in a Support Vector Machine (SVM) to predict early treatment failure. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validation.
resultsThe integrated model achieved the highest predictive accuracy, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.79, compared with 0.75 for the model based on clinical variables alone and 0.65 for the model based on imaging alone. Clinical variables accounted for most of the predictive signal, with the ultrasound-derived probability providing a modest but consistent additional value, particularly in larger treated volumes (≥ 5.7 cc).
conclusionThis two-stage framework combining deep learning and clinical variables improves prediction of early treatment failure after HIFU, supporting point-of-care risk stratification and individualized follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42380369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.