Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380363›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Exploring the barriers to optimal survivorship care for people living with Cancer in NSW.

Yuqi Ouyang, Helen Tran, Brad Gellert, Elizabeth Kennedy, Carolyn Mazariego-Jones, Michael David, Janette Vardy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuqi OuyangPolicy and Advocacy Unit, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Helen TranPolicy and Advocacy Unit, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Brad GellertPolicy and Advocacy Unit, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Elizabeth KennedySchool of Population Health, UNSW, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Carolyn Mazariego-JonesSchool of Population Health, UNSW, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Michael DavidThe Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
Janette VardySydney Cancer Survivorship Centre, Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Repatriation & General Hospital, Hospital Rd, Concord, NSW, 2139, Australia. janette.vardy@sydney.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study aims to understand the perceptions and provision of survivorship care among cancer survivors and identify barriers to optimal care. The findings will also provide insights to help Cancer Council NSW to develop policy recommendations to ensure survivors receive comprehensive support throughout their post-treatment journey.

methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among cancer survivors aged 18 and older who had completed active treatment (n = 209). Data on survivorship care experiences, barriers to access, and unmet needs were collected. Firth logistic and ordinal regression models were used to analyse associations between outcomes (ease of accessing care, information about supportive care, care effectiveness, and unmet needs) and demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical predictors.

resultsMost patients (64.2%) received information about supportive care services, and 72.2% felt their needs were met, but only 44.8% found access easy. Educational level was significantly associated with the effectiveness of care after treatment; while lacking a survivorship care plan was associated with lower perceived effectiveness of care after treatment (adjusted OR: 12.80, P < 0.001). Women reported significantly greater difficulty accessing supportive care services (adjusted OR: 0.08, P = 0.004) compared to men. Key barriers included high costs and long appointment wait times, particularly for psychological support, exercise physiology and specialist care.

conclusionAddressing barriers to survivorship care in NSW requires targeted policy interventions, including financial support, enhanced access across gender groups, and standardised survivorship care plans. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The findings assist Cancer Council NSW advocate for policy recommendations to enhance survivorship care services, ensuring equitable access for all cancer survivors.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsHealth Services AccessibilityNeoplasmsSurvivorshipAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesSex FactorsCancer survivorshipOptimal cancer survivorshipPolicy advocacySupportive care

Identifiers

PMID42380363
PMCPMC13319190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.