Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380360›Full record

ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2026

Parsing Through the Data on Achilles Tendon Rupture Management, Rehab and Sports Return Criteria: a Current Literature Review.

Lambert T Li, Ansh Shah, Greta Wilker, Morgan W Rice, Shana Miskovsky

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lambert T LiUH of Cleveland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Drusinsky Sports Medicine Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. lambert.li@uhhospitals.org.
Ansh ShahUH of Cleveland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Drusinsky Sports Medicine Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Greta WilkerUH of Cleveland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Drusinsky Sports Medicine Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Morgan W RiceUH of Cleveland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Drusinsky Sports Medicine Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Shana MiskovskyUH of Cleveland Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Drusinsky Sports Medicine Institute, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA. shana.miskovsky@uhhospitals.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate and discuss controversies that have arisen as management of acute and chronic Achilles tendon ruptures continues to evolve. Areas of debate include operative versus nonoperative treatment, best repair or reconstruction techniques, timing of post-op weightbearing protocols, and newer functional rehabilitation interventions. With the incidence of Achilles tendon ruptures increasing, the goal of this review is to provide a resource in determining best treatment options. RECENT

findingsEvidence demonstrates that operative and nonoperative management yield comparable long-term functional outcomes. However, surgical repairs offer lower rerupture rates and earlier return to activity. There is a trend towards minimally invasive techniques for primary repairs, favored due to reduced wound complications and faster recovery. Earlier surgical intervention after injury shows improved functional outcomes. For chronic ruptures, flexor hallucis longus tendon transfer is the workhorse of secondary reconstruction. Early functional rehabilitation has been shown to be safe and effective across treatment strategies. The management of Achilles tendon injuries remains a complex clinical challenge that demands a comprehensive understanding of the tendon biomechanics, and distinct pathophysiological differences between acute and chronic presentations. Selection between operative and non-operative management requires individualized consideration, while adhering to evidence-based rehabilitation protocols is paramount to successful functional outcomes. Navigating these patient specific treatment options for various patient populations promotes optimal recovery in the short and long term.

Indexed as

Achilles tendon reconstructionAchilles tendon ruptureFHL transferFunctional Achilles rehabilitationMinimally invasive Achilles repairSurgical repair

Identifiers

PMID42380360
PMCPMC13319554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.