Observational studyLasers in medical science2026
Clinical outcomes of a vacuum-assisted multimodal picosecond tattoo removal protocol: a retrospective case series.
Observational study in Lasers in medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser tattoo removal often requires multiple treatment sessions despite advances in picosecond laser technology. Multimodal approaches aimed at improving treatment efficiency are increasingly being explored. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of a vacuum-assisted multimodal picosecond laser tattoo removal protocol. A retrospective observational case series was conducted including 16 tattoos that completed treatment with standardized photographic follow-up. The protocol combined fractional ablative laser pretreatment (1064 nm, 3-5 stacks), followed by two full-beam picosecond 1064 nm passes with application of a vacuum-assisted device between passes. Standardized images were acquired using the Quantificare imaging system. Treatment outcomes were independently evaluated by three blinded experts. Kirby-Desai estimated treatment sessions were additionally calculated as a historical comparative reference. Sixteen tattoos completed treatment and were included in the final analysis. Mean pigment clearance exceeded 90% following a mean of 3.19 treatment sessions, with high interobserver agreement among blinded evaluators. The observed number of treatment sessions was lower than Kirby-Desai estimated values used as historical reference. No severe long-term adverse events were observed. This retrospective case series suggests that a vacuum-assisted multimodal picosecond laser tattoo removal protocol may be associated with high tattoo clearance rates using relatively few treatment sessions. However, given the retrospective design, absence of a control group, and multimodal nature of the protocol, the independent contribution of vacuum assistance cannot be determined. Prospective controlled studies are needed to further evaluate the role of adjunctive mechanical approaches in tattoo removal optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.