ArticleScientific reports2026
Registration-based 3D Light Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy and 2D histology image fusion tool for pathological specimen.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- X-ray contrast-adjustable 3D printing for multimodal fusion of microCT and histology.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histological analysis traditionally relies on thin tissue sections, providing inherently two-dimensional (2D) information. However, this approach captures only a fraction of the entire sample and lacks the spatial context necessary for comprehensive tissue assessment. Recent advancements in multimodal imaging have introduced the fusion of histological data with three-dimensional (3D) imaging techniques, such as Light Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy (LSFM), to enhance tissue analysis by integrating complementary spatial information. A key challenge in this fusion process is the accurate alignment of corresponding structures across modalities, which is complicated by differences in resolution, sectioning-induced deformations, and varying imaging orientations. This is further complicating in the case of 2D-to-3D registration where the initial alignment of the image inside the volume is unknown and registration processes are computationally expensive due to six degrees of freedom in the placement. Here, existing solutions often require manual selection of image pairs, fiducial markers or technical expertise, limiting accessibility to non-specialist users. To address these limitations, we introduce LitSHi (Light Sheet meets Histology), a novel registration tool that enables the automated and precise alignment of LSFM and histological images. LitSHi allows multimodal image fusion to be performed fully automatically, which significantly reduces the need for manual intervention. Using testicular tumor and pancreatic specimens, we evaluated LitSHi and demonstrated its ability to enhance structural correspondence between LSFM and histological images. The automated registration process markedly improved both efficiency and alignment accuracy compared with conventional manual or semi-automated approaches. Overall, LitSHi holds significant potential to advance digital pathology by enabling optimized multimodal tissue analysis and supporting future developments in computational pathology and AI-driven diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.