Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380337›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[National infrastructures and the European Health Data Space].

Peter Mildenberger, Alexandra Resch

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter MildenbergerKlinik für Radiologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. mildenbe@uni-mainz.de.
Alexandra ReschSigmund Freud Privat Universität Wien, Wien, Österreich.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe introduction of digital systems in healthcare has been under discussion for over two decades. While implementation within individual facilities is well advanced, there is still considerable room for improvement in cross-facility data exchange. RESEARCH QUESTION: To describe the current state of digital connectivity and organizational frameworks in Germany and Austria. MATERIALS AND

methodsAnalysis and description of the legal framework and the various initiatives in both countries.

resultsIn Germany, the comprehensive introduction of an electronic health records in 2026 marks a significant step toward increasing digitalization. While the current focus is primarily on documents and electronic medication, this structure could also prove useful for image data exchange in the future. Austria, on the other hand, created structures several years ago with the introduction of ELGA (electronic health records) that allow for more comprehensive digital communication. Consequently, more has already been achieved in terms of implementing Europe-wide EU recommendations.

conclusionThe status of national infrastructure implementation differs between the two countries. Overall, increasing acceptance has been observed in recent years. The European initiative for a European Health Data Space (EHDS) could lead to further intensification of the integration of digital services and interoperability.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsAustriaDigital HealthEuropeGermanyHumansAustriaElectronic health recordsInteroperabilityNetworksTeleradiology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.