ArticleInternational orthopaedics2026
Time neutrality and reduced ecological burden - handheld robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty improves operating room efficiency compared with manual total knee arthroplasty.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether imageless handheld robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) can achieve time neutrality compared with manual TKA (mTKA) within a standardised workflow, while assessing operating-room (OR) efficiency, environmental impact, and intraoperative workload demand.
methodsIn this prospective study, 24 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA were stratified to either rTKA (n = 12) or mTKA (n = 12). A process analysis captured 75 timestamps per case and quantified preparation, surgical, breakdown, turnover, and total OR times. Instrument trays were counted and weighed; reprocessing-related water and electricity consumption and costs were estimated. Perceived workload demand was assessed after both rTKA and mTKA using the NASA Task Load Index.
resultsNo statistically significant differences were observed between rTKA and mTKA for any OR time interval (total OR time 79.8 ± 8.1 vs. 75.8 ± 5.3 min, p = 0.19; mean surgical time 40.3 ± 4.2 vs. 37.3 ± 3.9 min, p = 0.10 for rTKA vs. mtKA respectively). The reduction of one tray for rTKA cases corresponded to estimated savings of €13,900, 3,900 L of water, and 140 kWh of electricity in sterilisation based on an annual volume of 250 cases. For rTKA, the NASA-TLX domain scores demonstrated lower perceived workload and frustration for rTKA than for mTKA (all p < 0.001), with a significantly higher perceived performance rating (p = 0.025).
conclusionImageless handheld rTKA achieved time neutrality compared with mTKA in a standardised high-volume workflow and was associated with reduced intraoperative workload demand. These findings support the feasibility of integrating handheld robotic assistance without compromising OR efficiency, while potentially improving staff experience and reducing resource utilisation, thereby contributing to value-based arthroplasty care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.