ArticlePediatric research2026
Optimizing therapeutic hypothermia conditions in a translational preclinical model of neonatal hypoxia-ischemia in rats.
Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTherapeutic hypothermia is the only clinically approved treatment for neonatal hypoxia-ischemia (NHI), although its efficacy remains partial. In preclinical research, hypothermia is widely used as a reference therapy; however, its protocol is highly variable across studies, limiting robust comparisons with emerging neuroprotective strategies. This study aimed to define an optimal and standardized hypothermia protocol in the Rice-Vannucci model, not to challenge clinical practice, but to establish a reliable benchmark for preclinical therapeutic development.
methodsNHI was induced in postnatal day 7 (P7) rat pups, followed by normothermia or hypothermia for 2, 3, or 5 hours. Short- and long-term outcomes were assessed using lesion volume measurements by MRI, neurological scoring, behavioral tests, and histological analyses. The impact of immediate hypothermia initiation was also examined.
resultsAcross analyses, both 2- and 3-hour hypothermia durations provided greater neuroprotection than 5 hours-including brain lesion volume, motor and cognitive performances, and markers of neuronal preservation and neuroinflammation. However, for several parameters, 2 hours of hypothermia showed superior efficacy compared with 3 hours. Immediate initiation further modestly improved outcomes.
conclusionA 2-hour hypothermia protocol represents the most robust and reproducible preclinical reference, enabling meaningful comparison with novel therapies in the Rice-Vannucci model. IMPACT: By establishing an optimized hypothermia protocol in the Vannucci model, this study offers a consistent and robust reference for preclinical evaluation of emerging therapies. It does not question clinical hypothermia protocols, but addresses variability in preclinical literature Optimizing the hypothermia reference protocol is mandatory to reliably identify new effective treatments in preclinical studies and to enhance their likelihood of successful and efficient clinical translation.
Identifiers
42380322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.