ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Self-Retaining, Double-Ended Surgical Retractor: A Novel Instrument for Rhinoplasty and Reconstructive Procedures.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStable surgical exposure is essential for precision in rhinoplasty and reconstructive procedures. While traditional handheld retractors remain highly effective and versatile, certain operative settings may benefit from hands-free stabilization to reduce assistant workload and maintain consistent exposure.
objectivesTo describe the design and potential clinical utility of two newly developed, reusable, double-ended self-retaining retractors (KAYIRAN-1 and KAYIRAN-2) intended to provide ergonomic flexibility and stable field exposure.
methodsTwo stainless-steel retractors were engineered with dual functional distal ends and integrated spring-assisted fixation mechanisms. The instruments allow 180° intraoperative rotation and attachment to surgical drapes or a Mayo stand for hands-free stabilization. Their use was evaluated in selected aesthetic and reconstructive procedures to assess handling characteristics, stability, and workflow integration.
resultsThe double-ended configuration enabled rapid adaptation to surgical angle or hand preference without instrument exchange. Spring-assisted fixation provided stable exposure in moderate soft tissue retraction settings, reducing the need for continuous manual tension. The instruments functioned as adjunct tools alongside conventional retractors.
conclusionsThe described double-ended self-retaining retractors represent a practical ergonomic adjunct for selected rhinoplasty and reconstructive procedures. While not intended to replace dynamic manual retraction, they may serve as a complementary adjunct in selected clinical scenarios, potentially improving workflow efficiency and reducing assistant dependency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: (Instrument description/Expert opinion). This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
42380315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.