ArticleHeart and vessels2026
Differential prognostic impact of interleukin-6 in acute heart failure with reduced versus preserved ejection fraction.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reply to "Interleukin-6 in acute heart failure: a marker of phenotype-specific biology or multimorbidity?"Heart and vessels · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interleukin-6 (IL-6) plays a role in acute heart failure (AHF) and can predict death and re-hospitalization. However, the relationship between IL-6 levels and mortality, based on heart failure phenotype, remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the association between IL-6 levels and mortality in patients with AHF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). A retrospective observational study was conducted on 371 AHF cases admitted to our institution. Patients were categorized into two groups based on IL-6 levels using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis: those with IL-6 below 29.0 pg/mL (N = 239) and those above 29.0 pg/mL (N = 132). Mortality rates were assessed for both HFrEF and HFpEF patients to determine the differential impact of IL-6. The average age was 71 years, with 60% male. Over a median follow-up of 222 days, 53 patients (14.8%) died. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly higher mortality rate in patients with IL-6 levels above 29.0 pg/mL (P < 0.001). Elevated IL-6 levels were associated with increased mortality in both categories of left ventricular ejection fraction. In particular, among patients with HFrEF, those with elevated IL-6 levels exhibited a higher risk of death after 30 days (P = 0.017), while HFpEF patients with elevated IL-6 levels had a higher risk of death within 30 days (P = 0.002). Elevated IL-6 levels predicted higher all-cause mortality in both HFrEF and HFpEF patients. The effect of elevated IL-6 on mortality varies between short-term and long-term implications for HFrEF and HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42380304What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.