ArticleScientific reports2026
Mammals tolerate harmless human presence: Lessons from COVID-19 lockdown on Barro Colorado Island, Panamá.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human presence in protected forests impacts wildlife, but investigating such impacts is challenging because it is rare to isolate human presence from other anthropogenic factors. The COVID-19 lockdowns in 2020 provided a quasi-natural experiment that reduced human activity on Barro Colorado Island, a tropical forest isolated from most human footprints in Panamá. We used trail-based camera trap data from mammal species to compare a lockdown period (April-July 2020) versus non-lockdown (2019). For all observed species, we tested the hypotheses that human presence impacts activity level for 14 species, and for focal species we also tested diel activity, predator-prey dynamics, group cohesiveness, scent-marking, foraging, and vigilance. To assess lockdown effect, we analyzed our data using negative binomial, logistic and recurrent event analysis, and we contrasted null and alternative models. We also estimated diel activity patterns and used confidence intervals to examine lockdown effects. Based on camera trap observations, human presence on BCI forest was 9 times lower, while 16.2 times lower based on safety book records. Results showed no significant changes in activity level (rate of events) and diel activity for any species; in foraging duration of agouti, collared-peccary, red-brocket deer, and white-nosed coati; in predator-prey dynamic between agouti and ocelot; and in scent-marking of agouti. However, group cohesiveness and vigilance of white-nosed coati and collared-peccary were higher during lockdown. Overall, under lockdown, animal activity and diel activity patterns remained unchanged, although agouti, peccary, coati, and ocelot's diel activity slightly increased during typical human-active hours. Our results indicate that mammals, living on a managed forest with low anthropogenic impact and disturbance, can tolerate non-consumptive human presence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.