ArticleNPJ digital medicine2026
Enhancing anatomical recognition by surgeons during pelvic lymph node dissection using artificial intelligence.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lateral pelvis is a critical anatomical region in colorectal, gynecological, and urological surgeries. However, its anatomical complexity and variability pose significant challenges for pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model to identify key anatomical structures relevant to PLND and evaluate whether AI assistance enhances surgeons' ability to recognize pelvic anatomical features. Thirty-six surgeons representing colorectal, gynecological, and urological specialties, with varying experience levels, reviewed 640 video snippets (0.5 s each) from PLND procedures. The model was trained on 23,259 annotated and 653 unannotated images extracted from 293 PLND procedure videos. Threefold cross-validation yielded Dice similarity coefficients of 0.6483 for the ureter, 0.8654 for the obturator nerve, 0.8619 for the external iliac artery, and 0.8736 for the external iliac vein. Across all structures, AI assistance led to a significant improvement in sensitivity and specificity among participating surgeons (p < .001). Our findings suggest that the proposed AI model may assist surgeons in identifying pelvic anatomical structures across different specialties and experience levels. Further studies using continuous intraoperative workflows will be required to determine its impact on clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.