ArticleScientific reports2026
A taphonomic reassessment of Qafzeh 25 and its implications for violence, health and funerary practices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Qafzeh cave preserves one of the most significant Middle Paleolithic human assemblages, offering key insights into health, possible violence, and funerary behavior among human Middle Paleolithic samples. In this study, we present new evidence of sharp-force trauma in the individual Qafzeh-25. The integrated macro-, microscopic, and micro-computed tomography analysis revealed a linear lesion affecting the left mandible and third premolar, consistent with an injury caused by a sharp object. Localized bone porosity and marginal thickening consistent with remodeling indicate that the lesion underwent a healing process, suggesting that the individual survived for a period of time after the injury. This case may represent one of the earliest documented examples of sharp-force trauma in the archaeological record and contributes to the limited evidence of possible interpersonal violence during the Middle Paleolithic. The taphonomic study conducted here confirms that Qafzeh-25 was deliberately buried, reinforcing previous interpretations of the site as a place of formal burials in the early Late Pleistocene. Additionally, we identified additional dental pathologies, including new carious lesion and enamel defects. These findings add to the previous recorded evidence of caries and dental anomalies in the Qafzeh sample, highlighting both biological vulnerability and possible hereditary or environmental factors. Together, the trauma, oral pathologies, and funerary context illuminate the complexity of health, social support, and culture of death in the Pleistocene human fossil record.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.