ArticleScientific data2026
A dataset on habitat-associated changes in the fecal microbiota of Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drosophila melanogaster is a flagship model for studying animal-microbe interactions. In nature, its larvae develop on ephemeral plant substrates, where growth depends on the presence and metabolic activity of bacterial and fungal symbionts. Yet, microbial communities associated with natural breeding sites differ markedly from those maintained in laboratory cultures on artificial media. Most research on Drosophila-microbe interactions has been conducted under controlled but artificial conditions, limiting our understanding of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of these associations. To bridge this gap, we re-associated laboratory fly cultures with field-exposed plant substrates, establishing semi-natural microcosms that harbor diverse, substrate-specific microbiota. Microcosms were sustained by fly-mediated transfer of microbial communities through fecal deposition onto new plant substrates. We present a comprehensive metabarcoding dataset of D. melanogaster fecal microbiota, including both bacterial (16S V3-V4) and fungal (ITS2) communities. To capture temporal dynamics, six plant substrate-based microcosms - apple, tomato, lemon, grape, onion, and plum - were sampled three times over five months, providing strain-level resolution of symbiont community composition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.