Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42380165›Full record

ArticleScientific data2026

A dataset on habitat-associated changes in the fecal microbiota of Drosophila melanogaster.

Elisabeth K Riedel, Marko Rohlfs

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elisabeth K RiedelInstitute of Ecology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. eriedel@uni-bremen.de.
Marko RohlfsInstitute of Ecology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. rohlfs1@uni-bremen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster is a flagship model for studying animal-microbe interactions. In nature, its larvae develop on ephemeral plant substrates, where growth depends on the presence and metabolic activity of bacterial and fungal symbionts. Yet, microbial communities associated with natural breeding sites differ markedly from those maintained in laboratory cultures on artificial media. Most research on Drosophila-microbe interactions has been conducted under controlled but artificial conditions, limiting our understanding of the ecological and evolutionary dynamics of these associations. To bridge this gap, we re-associated laboratory fly cultures with field-exposed plant substrates, establishing semi-natural microcosms that harbor diverse, substrate-specific microbiota. Microcosms were sustained by fly-mediated transfer of microbial communities through fecal deposition onto new plant substrates. We present a comprehensive metabarcoding dataset of D. melanogaster fecal microbiota, including both bacterial (16S V3-V4) and fungal (ITS2) communities. To capture temporal dynamics, six plant substrate-based microcosms - apple, tomato, lemon, grape, onion, and plum - were sampled three times over five months, providing strain-level resolution of symbiont community composition.

Indexed as

Drosophila melanogasterEcosystemFecesMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaFungiSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID42380165
PMCPMC13319503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.