ArticleNature communications2026
Distinct and compensatory roles of STAG1 and STAG2 in post-mitotic genome refolding.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The 3D architecture of the eukaryotic genome is largely shaped by cohesin complexes containing either STAG1 or STAG2 subunits. Yet, their roles in post-mitotic genome refolding remain unclear. Here, we establish STAG2 as the predominant paralog and primary orchestrator of this process. We find that upon mitotic exit, STAG1 depletion imposes negligible effects on genome refolding or transcription reactivation, whereas STAG2 regulates genome remodeling in a stage- and chromatin-context-dependent manner. In early-G1, STAG2 promotes small euchromatic structural loops, enhancer-promoter contacts and transcriptional refiring; in late-G1, it suppresses large loops by limiting the more processive STAG1-cohesin. STAG2 processivity is constrained by CTCF roadblocks rather than genomic traveling distance. Co-depletion causes synergistic loss of structural loops and stronger transcriptional dysregulation, yet residual chromatin-bound cohesin retains measurable extrusion capacity. Together, these results establish STAG2 as the principal regulator of post-mitotic spatiotemporal chromatin reorganization, while STAG1 provides compensatory support for robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.