ArticleInternational journal of oral science2026
Autonomous robotic execution of nonlinear toolpaths for geometry-matched osteotomy in tooth autotransplantation: an in vitro study.
Article in International journal of oral science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tooth autotransplantation requires recipient socket preparation that matches donor root morphology while preserving surrounding bone. We developed an autonomous multi-axis robotic system that executes nonlinear, surface-conforming milling trajectories to create a geometry-matched socket and compared it with a static tooth-supported guide in forty 3D-printed mandibular models representing single-rooted and double-rooted anatomies. Recipient sockets were planned by offsetting the donor root surface by 0.5 mm and eliminating insertion axis undercuts. The robot executed the planned milling path with a depth-stop Lindemann bur, whereas the guide workflow used guided pilot drilling followed by freehand refinement. Robot assistance reduced deep positional errors and improved agreement between planned and prepared socket geometry, with the most pronounced benefit in double-rooted models, while overall preparation time was comparable between approaches. These findings support further clinical validation to confirm that autonomous robotic, surface-conforming osteotomy can improve full-depth geometric fidelity and reduce unnecessary bone removal in technique-sensitive autotransplantation procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.